Sitearc

What website maintenance costs, worked from real inputs

Two filled price calculations at different cadences. The inputs that move the number, and what to leave out of a quote.

Answers
Price a retainer from inputs rather than a market average.
Worked examples
Two filled price calculations, one site and one roster
Written for
Freelancers and agencies

There is no market average worth copying

A published average hides the inputs, and the inputs are the answer. Two sites that look alike can cost different amounts to keep.

The inputs

sites            the count you maintain
cadence          7 or 14 days, stated in days
change appetite  changes reviewed and shipped per cycle
source coverage  how many sources are connected
platform cost    hosting, licences, tooling for the workspace
overhead         reporting and the client conversation

Two filled calculations

One site, 14 day cadence, one and a half changes per cycle, $95 an hour.

cycles per month                 2.2
read     2.2 x 0.33 h          = 0.73 h
decide   2.2 x 0.25 h          = 0.55 h
ship     2.2 x 1.5 x 0.75 h    = 2.48 h
report                         = 0.50 h
total                          = 4.26 h
price    4.26 x $95            = $404.70
platform, Pro for the owner    =  $99.00
rounded                        = $505 a month

Six sites, 14 day cadence, one change per cycle, a shared monthly report.

cycles per month                 2.2
read     6 x 2.2 x 0.33 h      = 4.36 h
decide   6 x 2.2 x 0.25 h      = 3.30 h
ship     6 x 2.2 x 1.0 x 0.75  = 9.90 h
report, all six                = 1.50 h
total                          = 19.06 h
price    19.06 x $95           = $1,810.70
platform, six sites on Pro     =  $99.00
rounded                        = $1,910 a month

What moves the number fastest

  1. Change appetite. Two shipped changes per cycle doubles the shipping hours.
  2. Missing sources. Reconnecting one costs hours in the first cycle.
  3. Site count. The per-site work is small, and the shared report is not.

Acceptance: the price is defensible when

  • hours come from your own last three months
  • the cadence in the price matches the plan
  • platform cost is a visible line
  • the excluded work is quoted separately
  • a review trigger exists for when the appetite grows

Troubleshooting

Symptom Likely cause What to do
Every month overruns Change appetite grew Trigger the review clause
The client compares to a cheaper quote The cheaper quote has no cadence Show the cycle counts side by side
One site takes twice as long A missing source, or no repository Price the access gap into onboarding
The invoice is contested Hours were never explained Send the calculation with the invoice
Margin falls over a year Rates were never raised Add a yearly review to the plan

Limits

These hours are a model. Track one cycle honestly, then replace every estimate with your own numbers.

Platform cost is separate from your time. A price that swallows the tools is a price you will resent by the third month.

Where this came from