Sitearc

A website maintenance plan with real intervals and owners

A cadence plan built on two intervals, filled in for one client. The owners and the review trigger, named.

Answers
Write a maintenance plan a client will hold you to.
Included plan
A filled plan for one client, with owners and a review trigger
Written for
Agencies and freelancers selling retainers

The two intervals that matter

The first is how often you review the site’s data. The second is how often you report to the client. Everything else in a plan hangs off those two, because a review is where findings appear.

In Sitearc, Free refreshes connected data when you ask. Pro also refreshes it on a schedule.

A filled plan

Cedar and Slate Interiors, one site, quoted at $420 a month.

cadence
- every 14 days   refresh, read the findings, triage
- every month     close what shipped, write the update
- every quarter   re-read the search data, choose one theme
- every year      review hosting, certificate, backups, and the offer

owners
- refresh and read        Priya, Northline Studio
- approve a change        Sam, Cedar and Slate
- merge a pull request    Ravi, contract developer
- client update           Priya, by the 5th of the month

included
- up to two shipped changes each cycle
- feedback triage and the search reading
- one written update a month
- access management for Search Console and Analytics

excluded
- new pages, sections or templates
- redesigns and brand work
- paid media
- work caused by a change we did not make

review trigger
- if shipped changes average more than two a cycle for two months,
  we agree a new rate before the third month

Why owners belong in the plan

Every step that needs a decision needs a name. A plan without owners turns into a monthly email nobody answers.

Acceptance: the plan is signed when

  • the cadence is written in days, not adjectives
  • every decision has a named person
  • the included work has a number in it
  • the excluded list names at least four items
  • the review trigger has a number and a date rule
  • the price and the platform cost are separate lines

Troubleshooting

Symptom Likely cause What to do
The client approves nothing No owner was named Agree one approver, in writing
Scope creeps every month The excluded list is vague Add the specific item that crept in
The plan is ignored It was sent as a PDF nobody opens Put the cadence in the workspace where work happens
Two people approve conflicting changes Two approvers Name one, and a deputy
The retainer feels thin The cadence is longer than the client expects Move to 7 days, and re-quote

Limits

A cadence is not a guarantee of a result. Some cycles find nothing worth changing, and the honest plan says so.

This covers one site. A roster uses the same plan per site, with the site count in the price.

Where this came from